NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility.

Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

An Example NURS 6052 Module 2 Assignment Follows:

Matrix Worksheet Template

Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies.

Full citation of the selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4
 Darwish, R. M., AlMasri, M., Ammar, K., AlMasri, R., Al- Najar, H., & Al-Masri, M. M. (2023). Assessing pharmacists and other healthcare providers’ knowledge of hand sanitization during COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: A comparative study. PloS One, 18(4), e0283328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283328 Goyal, M. (2019). Impact of educational and training programs on knowledge of healthcare students regarding nosocomial infections, standard precautions, and hand hygiene: A study at tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine: Peer-Reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 23(5), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23166 Kong, A., Botero Suarez, C. S., Rahamatalli, B., Shankweiler, J., & Karasik, O. (2021). Hand hygiene and hospital-acquired infections during COVID-19 increased vigilance: One hospital’s experience. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 2(5), 379. https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1296 Szumska, E., Czajkowski, P., Zablocki, M., & Rozkiewicz, D. (2022). The association between hand disinfection techniques and their barriers, as well as the “bare below the elbows” concept, among healthcare professionals—A study based on a Polish population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811781 
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) I chose this article because it addresses a crucial aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is the knowledge and practice of hand sanitization among healthcare providers, including pharmacists. Hand hygiene is a fundamental measure in preventing the spread of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, and healthcare providers play a critical role in this regard. Understanding their knowledge and practices related to hand sanitization is essential for ensuring the safety of both healthcare workers and patients. The article is relevant to the clinical issue of interest because it assesses the knowledge of hand sanitization among healthcare providers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings from this study can have practical implications for improving the quality of care and infection control in healthcare settings. It highlights the importance of tailored training and educational strategies, particularly for pharmacists, who may have specific challenges or knowledge gaps in this area. This research follows ethical principles by conducting a cross-sectional study with informed consent from participants. It also used a pre-validated questionnaire, which suggests that efforts were made to ensure the validity and reliability of the data collected. The study’s results can inform healthcare institutions and policymakers about the need for targeted training and education to enhance hand hygiene practices among healthcare providers, ultimately contributing to patient and healthcare worker safety.  I chose this article because it addresses a crucial aspect of healthcare practice: infection control, particularly about nosocomial infections. The study focuses on healthcare students who are in the early stages of their clinical practice and assesses their knowledge about nosocomial infections, standard precautions, and hand hygiene. This is particularly relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where infection control measures have become paramount. The research is relevant to the clinical issue of interest because it emphasizes the importance of early education and training for healthcare students in infection control practices. It highlights the positive impact of educational programs on knowledge retention in areas critical to preventing nosocomial infections. This is especially pertinent as healthcare students are future practitioners who will play a vital role in infection control within healthcare settings. Ethically, they followed sound research practices. It was a cross-sectional cum interventional study, which means it obtained informed consent from participants. The use of a standardized questionnaire indicates an effort to ensure the validity and reliability of the data collected. The study’s findings have practical implications for healthcare education, emphasizing the need for regular and comprehensive training programs to reinforce infection control principles among healthcare students. I chose this article because it addresses a highly relevant and timely issue related to hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and hand hygiene compliance, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. HAIs are a significant concern in healthcare, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, healthcare costs, and length of hospital stays. Hand hygiene is a fundamental measure for preventing HAIs, and the study aims to explore the impact of increased vigilance for personal and institutional hygiene practices during the pandemic. The research is relevant to the clinical issue of interest because it investigates the hypothesis that increased hand hygiene compliance, driven by the heightened awareness of hygiene during the pandemic, could lead to a decrease in HAIs. This aligns with the broader goal of improving infection control and patient safety, which has become even more critical during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study followed appropriate research practices. It obtained relevant data from the hospital’s Quality Department and the National Healthcare Safety Network, ensuring the use of credible and reliable sources. The study acknowledges the limitations, such as a small sample size, which is essential for ethical transparency. It emphasizes the need for further research, indicating a commitment to robust scientific inquiry better to understand the impact of increased hygiene practices on HAIs. .I chose this article because it addresses a critical issue in healthcare – hand hygiene among healthcare workers and its role in preventing nosocomial infections. Hand hygiene is a fundamental practice for infection control, and understanding the factors that contribute to improper hand disinfection techniques is of great importance, especially in the context of patient safety and reducing healthcare-associated infections. The research is relevant to the clinical issue of interest because it investigates the effectiveness of hand disinfection techniques among healthcare workers and identifies risk factors that may explain why some individuals do not follow proper hand hygiene practices. This information can inform targeted interventions and education programs to improve hand hygiene compliance among healthcare professionals, which is crucial in preventing the spread of infections. In terms of ethics, the study obtained informed consent from the participants and followed ethical guidelines in conducting research involving healthcare workers. The findings highlight the need for ongoing education and training to improve hand hygiene practices among healthcare workers, which aligns with ethical principles of patient safety and infection control.  
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed articleThe research aims to evaluate and compare healthcare providers’ knowledge of hand sanitization and its usage in various professional healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan. The study intends to explore different variables that impact hand sanitization practices among healthcare providers, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of care and tailoring interventions to promote more appropriate use of hand sanitizers in healthcare settings.The research aims to assess the existing knowledge of healthcare students regarding nosocomial infections and evaluate the impact of interventions on their knowledge base. The goal is to sensitize healthcare students to the principles of nosocomial infections and equip them with the necessary skills to prevent and control these infections, ultimately ensuring better quality healthcare. The study intends to explore the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving awareness and knowledge of nosocomial infections among healthcare students.The article aims to highlight the most common hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), such as pneumonia, surgical site infections, and gastrointestinal infections, and the connection between hand hygiene compliance by healthcare providers and HAIs, emphasizing the ongoing challenge of suboptimal compliance despite various initiatives. The research aims to address the lack of proper hand disinfection techniques, which are a significant contributor to healthcare-associated infections. It emphasizes the importance of hand hygiene and explores the effectiveness of alcohol-based hand sanitizers compared to hand washing with soap. The study aims to assess compliance with hand hygiene procedures based on WHO recommendations.
Brief description of the research methodology used: Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.The research methodology used in this study is quantitative. It is a cross-sectional study conducted among 523 healthcare providers (HCPs) from different healthcare settings. Data collection was carried out through an online survey using a pre-validated structured questionnaire on hand sanitization based on the WHO questionnaire. The survey included multiple-choice questions, yes/no questions, and true/false questions, with a total score of 25 points. Demographic information about the participants was also collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26, with descriptive statistics, chi-square, and one-way ANOVA to assess knowledge scores. The study’s ethical considerations included approval from an ethics and research committee, informed consent, and voluntary participation.  The research methodology used in this study is quantitative. It is a cross-sectional and interventional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India. The study involved 728 participants, including MBBS, BDS, and BSc nursing students, and used a questionnaire called the Infection Control Standardized Questionnaire (ICSQ). The ICSQ consisted of two parts: one collecting demographic information and the other containing close-ended questions related to nosocomial infections, standard precautions, and hand hygiene. The responses to the questions were coded and scored. Participants received a brief workshop covering key concepts, followed by the administration of the ICSQ as a pretest and posttest. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0, including paired samples t-tests for intergroup comparisons.The research methodology used in this study is quantitative. The study employed a cross-sectional retrospective observational approach to examine the impact of COVID-19-related infection prevention control measures on hand hygiene compliance and hospital-acquired infections. Data on hand hygiene performance and hospital-acquired infections were collected and analyzed, with statistical tests, including two-way t-tests and Pearson correlation analysis, performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 24. The study focused on comparing pre- and post-implementation periods for infection control measures and their effect on hand hygiene compliance and standardized infection ratios (SIRs)The research utilized a quantitative approach and involved 123 healthcare facilities in Poland, covering both medical and non-medical personnel across various regions. Volunteers disinfected their hands using a standardized alcohol-based sanitizer during personnel training sessions focused on hand hygiene. Two trained outside observers recorded observations. Data, including participant characteristics and risk factors, were collected via anonymous questionnaires. The study adhered to ethical standards, with informed consent obtained from participants. Statistical analysis involved percentages, Mann–Whitney, ANOVA, chi-square tests, and odds ratios.
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. StrengthsQuantitative research provides objective and numerical data, enhancing the reliability of the findings. This study measured hand hygiene compliance and hospital-acquired infection rates quantitatively.The study spanned 18 months, allowing for examining trends and changes over time, which can provide valuable insights into the impact of infection control measures.Hand hygiene compliance data were collected using standardized procedures, including direct observation by concealed recorders, which ensures consistency and reliability.The use ofa statistical analyses such as t-tests and correlation analysis allows for rigorous examination of relationships and trends in the data.The study utilized data from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), which adds to the validity and generalizability of the findings. The use of standardized data collection methods and statistical analyses enhances the reliability of the study. The consistent recording of hand hygiene compliance by concealed recorders contributes to data reliability. The study’s validity is supported by the use of national databases and the examination of a range of hospital-acquired infections. The comparison of pre- and post-implementation data adds to the validity of assessing the impact of infection control measures.  Quantitative research methods were used in this study. The strengths include a large sample size of 728 participants, standardized data collection through the Infection Control Standardized Questionnaire (ICSQ), pretest-posttest design for intervention evaluation, and statistical analysis using SPSS. Reliability and validity were ensured through standardized questionnaires, training, and statistical analysis.Quantitative research. Strengths: Retrospective design, use of standardized infection ratios, statistical analysis. Reliability and validity are ensured through the use of standardized infection ratios and statistical analysis.Quantitative research. Strengths: Involvement of multiple healthcare facilities, standardized hand hygiene training, anonymous questionnaires, trained outside observers, adherence to ethical standards, comprehensive statistical analysis. Reliability and validity were maintained through standardized procedures and statistical tests.
General Notes/Comments The article collectively contributes to our understanding of hand hygiene practices among healthcare providers and their role in preventing HAIs. It highlights the importance of ongoing education, interventions, and monitoring to ensure the safety of both healthcare workers and patients.    This article provides valuable insights into the impact of education and training on infection control knowledge among healthcare students. It highlights the role of early education in shaping future healthcare practitioners who are well-equipped to prevent and control nosocomial infections.This article contributes valuable insights into the relationship between hand hygiene compliance, HAIs, and the impact of increased vigilance during the COVID-19 pandemic. It underscores the importance of infection control measures in healthcare settings, particularly during public health crises.This article contributes valuable insights into the factors influencing hand hygiene compliance among healthcare professionals. It underscores the importance of addressing barriers and providing proper training to ensure effective hand disinfection techniques. These findings are crucial for enhancing patient safety and reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections.

Having read the example above, we believe that you have learnt something regarding how to identify research methodologies. In your next task in this NURS 6052, which is week 4 discussion, searching databases that allows you to develop a picot question.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

When approaching a 500-word essay, it’s essential to understand the nuances of this compact form of writing. These frequently asked questions will guide you through the process of crafting a concise and impactful essay.

How many pages is a 500-word essay typically?

A 500-word essay usually spans about one page if single-spaced or two pages when double-spaced, with standard margins and a 12-point font size.

Can you provide examples of a well-structured 500-word essay?

Certainly, to see the structure and flow of a well-written essay, you might want to take a look at a student’s writing guide that provides insights and examples.

Are there specific formatting guidelines for a 500-word essay?

Formatting guidelines typically involve using a legible font like Times New Roman or Arial, size 12, with double-spacing and one-inch margins on all sides. Check any specific requirements your instructor might have provided.

What are some effective strategies for writing a personal essay of 500 words?

For a personal essay, focus on a singular event or characteristic, ensuring your ideas are clear and you reflect on the significance of the subject matter. Use concise language and powerful imagery to maximize impact.

What topics are suitable for a concise 500-word essay?

Choose topics you can thoroughly address within the word limit, such as a personal anecdote, a critical analysis of a poem, or a focused argument on a singular point or issue.

How much time should you allocate to write a 500-word essay effectively?

Depending on your familiarity with the topic and writing proficiency, allocate anywhere from one to several hours for planning, drafting, and revising to ensure a well-presented essay.