NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. 

Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

An Example NHS-FPX5004 Assessment 4 Self-Assessment of Leadership, Collaboration, and Ethics Follows:

Western Medical Enterprises Applicant Questionnaire

Section 1: Leadership and Collaboration Experience

Briefly describe an instance where you were required to lead and motivate a team of professionals to collaborate. It does not need to be in a healthcare setting. If you have not led a team of professionals before, use a different example.

Next, analyze your approach to the challenge using specific examples. It is not important whether or not your efforts were successful. What is important is the approach you take to appraising your leadership and collaboration decisions and actions. Do the following:

  1. Analyze your leadership of the project. Consider the following:
    • What was the purpose or shared vision of the team?
    • The effectiveness of your leadership approach and style. Did you get “buy-in” from stakeholders?
    • Decision-making processes and outcomes? What were your good decisions? What would you have done differently?
    • How did you communicate your vision, values, decisions, information, et cetera?
  2. Analyze your approach to fostering collaboration and motivation among stakeholders. Consider:
    • How well you facilitated member or participant collaboration and engagement with one another? Did participants communicate effectively?
    • Actions you took to motivate people to realize your vision or tactics. Did the team or participants feel motivated and energized by you? Why or why not?

My instance leading a team of healthcare professionals involved care for a patient who had been admitted with a diagnosis of complicated diabetes mellitus. The patient, who lives alone in a rural environment, had developed foot ulcers as a result of uncontrolled diabetes. I was assigned this patient by the unit nurse manager, who mandated me to coordinate every aspect of care for this elderly patient (Anderson & Hewner, 2021). Therefore, I started planning for this patient’s care by organizing a team of healthcare professionals and relevant stakeholders. I included the physician, nutritionist, surgeon, counseling psychologist, and social worker in his care team. Even though this team didn’t meet at one particular time, I ensured that it worked together to meet the patient care needs in the short and long term.

This team’s shared goal was for Mrs. X to improve clinically and holistically. This team also aimed to improve Mrs. X’s survival outside the community hospital. The last goal was for Mrs. X to spend the minimum time possible. Therefore, each team member could directly or indirectly contribute to these goals. My leadership approach was collaborative and required communicating and discussing patient care with all care stakeholders, including family caregivers. I think the team members bought this style because I achieved adequate cooperation from them and the patient subjectively reported good satisfaction.

My care decisions involved bringing in team stakeholders at different times during patient care. I think that this delayed patient recovery and increased hospital stay. The decision to include a physician in the patient’s care team was made late because this patient’s diabetic wound seemed more like a surgical problem than a medical problem. However, it was later realized that the patient’s regimen was ineffective and required changing. Therefore, the physician prescribed a new regimen for the patient that improved glycemic control in the next week. Surgical management focused more on wound management and debridement in the ward but maintained the patient’s medical regimen.

My communication of goals and vision of the team was made individually to the new team members as they were recruited. During the first physical meeting, I updated each team member on the patient’s care progress and pertinent information. This was my first experience with patient care coordination and I am delighted it worked successfully. Follow-up communications on patient care progress were made during phone consultations with each healthcare professional. When collaboration was needed, I could schedule both professionals to meet at the patient’s bedside for review and shared decision-making about new care plans and goals.

My approach to fostering collaboration was based on early planning because team members had different schedules that could not allow them to collaborate efficiently at a common time. This was the chief concern with my approach to collaboration. Therefore, I used their individual goals and timelines to schedule common meetings at the bedside if there was a need. Some members could only collaborate via phone calls, and surprisingly this was more efficient and successful. Timely communication and hearing overall team goals and plans seemed to motivate team members to adjust their interventions and goals to meet the common goal.

Section 2: Ethics Experience

Briefly describe an ethical dilemma demonstrating your application of ethical principles in health care. Next, analyze your response or actions (even if there were none) to the event against one of the reference points below. Were your inactions or choices supported by the chosen framework? Be specific and include two references citing one or more of the following.

●       Any workplace code of ethics (consider choosing one from a place you work or have worked).

●       The professional code of ethics for your profession.

AND one of the following:

●       Levitt, D. (2014). Ethical decision-making in a caring environment: The four principles and LEADS. Healthcare Management Forum, 27(2), 105–107.

●       American College of Healthcare Executives. (n.d.). ACHE code of ethics. https://www.ache.org/about-ache/our-story/our-commitments/ethics/ache-code-of-ethics

This patient desired radical management of her diabetic foot and ulcers but the surgeon advised against it and preferred a conservative approach using debridement, wound care, and hypoglycemic agents. The patient reasoned that her leg might end up dead anyway and it would be God’s will if so happens. Therefore, she opted for amputation, which led to an ethical dilemma pitting the surgeon, physician, nurse (me), and family caregiver. In this situation, applying the Code of Ethics for Nurses by the American Nurses Association. This code of ethics had provisions with interpretive statements that guided my coordination of care.

Even though the third provision of this code of ethics requires that the nurse’s primary commitment be to the patient, amputation would be a less safe strategy to improve the outcomes as the care team agreed. Therefore, I consulted a counseling psychologist who improved the patient’s perception of her condition and the best evidence-based outcomes. The eighth provision of the code requires that the nurse collaborates with other healthcare professionals to improve care outcomes (Brown & Finnell, 2015). This is the provision that helped in solving the ethical challenge in this patient’s case. The American College of Healthcare Executives codes requires that healthcare professionals should work to implement a process that would solve conflicts when patient interests differ from those of the healthcare professionals (American College of Healthcare Executives, 2022). My actions were supported by this framework. 

References

American College of Healthcare Executives. (2022, December 5). Code of Ethics. Ache.org. https://www.ache.org/about-ache/our-story/our-commitments/ethics/ache-code-of-ethics

Anderson, A., & Hewner, S. (2021). Care coordination: A concept analysis. The American Journal of Nursing, 121(12), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000803188.10432.e1

Brown, C. S., & Finnell, D. S. (2015). Provisions of the Code of Ethics for nurses: Interpretive statements for transplant nurses. Nephrology Nursing Journal: Journal of the American Nephrology Nurses’ Association, 42(1), 37–43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290916

Congratulations! This assessment marks the end of this NHS-FPX5004 class. I hope it has been a fruitful endeavor. The classes in this MSN program are just starting, so be assured we will walk the journey with you. Your next class is NHS-FPX6004 Health Law and Policy. The first assessment in this class is NHS-FPX6004 Assessment 1 Dashboard Metric Evaluations.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

When approaching a 500-word essay, it’s essential to understand the nuances of this compact form of writing. These frequently asked questions will guide you through the process of crafting a concise and impactful essay.

How many pages is a 500-word essay typically?

A 500-word essay usually spans about one page if single-spaced or two pages when double-spaced, with standard margins and a 12-point font size.

Can you provide examples of a well-structured 500-word essay?

Certainly, to see the structure and flow of a well-written essay, you might want to take a look at a student’s writing guide that provides insights and examples.

Are there specific formatting guidelines for a 500-word essay?

Formatting guidelines typically involve using a legible font like Times New Roman or Arial, size 12, with double-spacing and one-inch margins on all sides. Check any specific requirements your instructor might have provided.

What are some effective strategies for writing a personal essay of 500 words?

For a personal essay, focus on a singular event or characteristic, ensuring your ideas are clear and you reflect on the significance of the subject matter. Use concise language and powerful imagery to maximize impact.

What topics are suitable for a concise 500-word essay?

Choose topics you can thoroughly address within the word limit, such as a personal anecdote, a critical analysis of a poem, or a focused argument on a singular point or issue.

How much time should you allocate to write a 500-word essay effectively?

Depending on your familiarity with the topic and writing proficiency, allocate anywhere from one to several hours for planning, drafting, and revising to ensure a well-presented essay.