NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment – Step-by-Step Guide
The first step before starting to write the NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment paper.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility.
Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment paper.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456
Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.
An Example NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment Follows:
Workplace Environment Assessment
The assessment of workplace civility is critical in improving patient care quality and the healthcare environment. This paper explores the results of a comprehensive Work Environment Assessment using the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory and the enlightening comments from coworkers. Building on this framework, this discussion explores theories and concepts related to interprofessional cooperation and workplace civility through a critical assessment of a selection of literature, with a focus on the work of Clark. A second analysis examines the connections between these discoveries and how they might be used practically. Through integrating assessment results with evidence-based tactics, this essay aims to provide insight into developing high-performing interprofessional teams and fostering an environment that values excellence and respect.
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory yielded a score of 36, indicating a significantly unhealthy workplace. The ethical principles of the American Nurses Association prioritize establishing a peaceful and courteous atmosphere devoid of bullying, harassment, and violence (Clark, 2015).
Surprising Findings
There were two specific parts of the assessment results that were very unexpected. First, the widespread culture of apprehension and reprisal within the workplace was deeply concerning. Nurses who had the courage to express their concerns were often stigmatized as troublemakers and later terminated, fostering an atmosphere where speaking out was seen as risky. Furthermore, the absence of professional autonomy and proficient nursing leadership, as defined by Mabona et al. (2022), was particularly noticeable. The workplace lacked essential elements for promoting nurse well-being and a healthy environment, significantly contributing to its poor health.
Confirmed Belief
Before performing the assessment, there was a preexisting belief regarding the presence of incivility and unhealthy practices in the workplace. This opinion was substantiated, particularly following an unsettling occurrence during a nursing meeting where the Director of Nursing (DON) openly embarrassed and threatened the nursing staff based on their individual performance. This incident confirmed the presence of a hostile work environment.
Implications for Workplace Health and Civility
The evaluation emphasizes how urgently workplace health and civility issues need to be addressed. Essentially, incivility could jeopardize the quality of patient treatment, which has the ability to physically and emotionally hurt workers (Lewis, 2023). Building strong nursing leadership, promoting open communication, fostering teamwork, and allowing professional autonomy is imperative to foster a healthy work environment. The lack of these components encourages rudeness and has a detrimental effect on nurses’ well-being. The quality of patient care is in danger, employee satisfaction is low, and turnover is significant. Ensuring workplace health and civility requires addressing these challenges and fostering a culture of respect and cooperation. To avoid such experiences, job seekers should also take employee satisfaction and turnover rates into account while considering potential workplaces.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature
Theory/Concept in the Selected Article
The chosen article highlights how crucial it is to promote a respectful and courteous work environment, especially in healthcare settings. It recognizes the demanding nature of the healthcare industry and emphasizes the need for polite interactions, good communication, and emotional control in maintaining patient safety and providing high-standard treatment. The American Nurses Association’s (ANA) Code of Ethics is cited in the article. It outlines the duty of nurses to foster a culture of civility and condemns bullying, harassment, intimidation, manipulation, threats, and violence. Nurses are also expected to treat students, coworkers, employees, and other individuals with dignity and respect.
Relationship to Work Environment Assessment
The perspective outlined in this article is consistent with the findings of the Work Environment Assessment, which showed that the workplace was extremely unhealthy and characterized by dread and hostility. The essay emphasizes how essential it is to deal with rudeness and promote open communication, highlighting the need for change in workplaces where incivility thrives. It supports the idea that unhealthful work conditions can have a detrimental effect on both staff satisfaction and the standard of patient treatment.
Application to Improve Organizational Health and Work Teams
To improve the overall well-being of the organization and foster more cohesive work groups, it is crucial to properly implement the thoughts described in the chosen article. First, there should be an increased commitment by the leadership. Organizational leaders should fully and sincerely dedicate themselves to cultivating a workplace culture of civility and respect. To effectively guide others, it is imperative for them to demonstrate the desired conduct, serve as a role model, and actively encourage the exchange of ideas.
Through exemplifying their commitment to fostering a respectful work environment, they inspire workers to do the same. Moreover, applying conflict resolution models would be beneficial. Utilizing organized conflict resolution approaches, such as the DESC model (Describe, Express, State, Consequence), offers a systematic approach to dealing with rudeness and effectively resolving disagreements. These models provide staff with guidance on navigating difficult conversations, emphasizing the need to retain respect and find a resolution.
Additionally, enabling healthcare workers to assert themselves, particularly with regard to matters of patient safety, is of utmost necessity. Leaders should ensure that employees experience a sense of security and receive assistance when expressing concerns or reporting instances of rudeness or hostility. Fostering a culture of empowerment aids in mitigating the escalation of issues and enhancing openness. Lastly, promoting clear communication is critical. Inculcate transparent, polite, and considerate communication among team members. The leaders should highlight the significance of engaging in active listening and articulating issues in a constructive fashion. The organization may greatly enhance collaboration and promote a more respectful workplace environment by cultivating a conducive atmosphere that encourages employees to express their thoughts and tackle problems.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies
Addressing the Shortcomings
Several strategies can be utilized to address the shortcomings identified in the evaluation. First, there should be training in conflict resolution skills. Lyons et al. (2021) suggest establishing conflict resolution training initiatives for all healthcare staff members to address the observed deficiencies in workplace civility effectively. These programs can facilitate the acquisition of the necessary skills to efficiently navigate difficult conversations, handle disputes and foster communication that is characterized by respect. Enhancing conflict resolution skills enables healthcare staff to tackle incivility problems better, resulting in a more conducive work atmosphere.
Moreover, authorities should allocate resources toward leadership development programs to provide managers and leaders with the required abilities to establish and maintain a harmonious work environment. Efficient leadership plays a vital role in establishing the atmosphere of workplace culture (Vidman & Strömberg, 2020). Organizations can rectify deficiencies in leadership that contribute to incivility by instructing leaders in fostering open conversations, respect, and effective communication.
Bolstering Successful Practices
In the future, the organization has the opportunity to enhance and broaden the effective strategies identified in the Work Environment Assessment. Adopting team-based care approaches is a promising advancement for the future. These approaches prioritize collaboration among diverse healthcare experts, with each individual bringing their distinct skills to provide comprehensive patient care. Organizations can strengthen the good features of the work environment by actively promoting and establishing interprofessional teamwork. This not only improves patient outcomes but also guarantees a more cohesive and efficient workplace where healthcare workers flourish as high-performing teams.
Another proactive approach entails improving recognition and incentive programs. Organizations should prioritize enhancing these initiatives to cultivate a culture characterized by gratitude and respect. Providing recognition and incentives to healthcare workers for their contributions to patient care and fostering a respectful work environment serves as a strong motivation (Martins et al., 2021). By strengthening these favorable behaviors, the organization may establish a future in which professionals feel appreciated, thereby increasing their dedication to efficient collaboration and achieving exceptional results. The strategy is bound to enhance the feeling of membership and act as a driving force for continued cooperation, resulting in a substantial influence on the quality of patient care and the overall well-being of the organization.
Conclusion
A healthy workplace has a huge impact on patient care and staff well-being. The Work Environment Assessment recommends immediate action to address workplace incivility and lack of professional autonomy. To fix these issues, leaders must prioritize civility, open communication, and conflict resolution training. Team-based care and healthcare professional recognition improve the workplace. Creating a culture of respect and cooperation is both moral and strategic, with the potential to improve patient care and corporate performance.
NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment References
Clark., C.M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Accessed 27th October 2023 from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023
Lewis, C. (2023). The impact of interprofessional incivility on medical performance, service and patient care: a systematic review. Future Healthcare Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2022-0092
Lyons, O., Forbat, L., Menson, E., Chisholm, J. C., Pryde, K., Conlin, S., Felton, V., Ingle, S., McKenzie, C., Ramachandran, R., Sayer, C., Snowball, C., Strachan-Gadsby, E., Tisovszky, N., & Barclay, S. (2021). Transforming training into practice with the conflict management framework: a mixed methods study. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 5(1), e001088. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001088
Mabona, J. F., Van Rooyen, D. R. M., & Ten Ham-Baloyi, W. (2022). Best practice recommendations for healthy work environments for nurses: An integrative literature review. Health SA Gesondheid, 27(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1788
Martins, C., Potra, T., Lucas, F., & Lucas, P. B. (2021). Motivational factors of nurses in a group of primary health centres in the city of Lisbon: qualitative study. Annals of Medicine, 53(sup1), S98–S98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1895984
Vidman, Å., & Strömberg, A. (2020). Leadership for a healthy work environment – a question about who, what and how. Leadership in Health Services, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-06-2020-0041
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
When approaching a 500-word essay, it’s essential to understand the nuances of this compact form of writing. These frequently asked questions will guide you through the process of crafting a concise and impactful essay.
How many pages is a 500-word essay typically?
A 500-word essay usually spans about one page if single-spaced or two pages when double-spaced, with standard margins and a 12-point font size.
Can you provide examples of a well-structured 500-word essay?
Certainly, to see the structure and flow of a well-written essay, you might want to take a look at a student’s writing guide that provides insights and examples.
Are there specific formatting guidelines for a 500-word essay?
Formatting guidelines typically involve using a legible font like Times New Roman or Arial, size 12, with double-spacing and one-inch margins on all sides. Check any specific requirements your instructor might have provided.
What are some effective strategies for writing a personal essay of 500 words?
For a personal essay, focus on a singular event or characteristic, ensuring your ideas are clear and you reflect on the significance of the subject matter. Use concise language and powerful imagery to maximize impact.
What topics are suitable for a concise 500-word essay?
Choose topics you can thoroughly address within the word limit, such as a personal anecdote, a critical analysis of a poem, or a focused argument on a singular point or issue.
How much time should you allocate to write a 500-word essay effectively?
Depending on your familiarity with the topic and writing proficiency, allocate anywhere from one to several hours for planning, drafting, and revising to ensure a well-presented essay.